Legal Opinion

People v. Haynes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 25, 1993PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Corriero, J.), rendered December 13, 1990, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that he was deprived of a fair trial as a result of the alleged violation by the prosecutor of the trial court’s Sandoval ruling. We disagree. The cross-examination of a defendant in regard to matters precluded by the trial court’s Sandoval ruling constitutes error (see, People v Wilkens, 177…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. AshwalNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. People v. DurhamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. People v. PerezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  4. People v. BouteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  5. People v. WilkensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. RogersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. People v. HowardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. People v. RogersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API