People v. Haynes
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Corriero, J.), rendered December 13, 1990, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that he was deprived of a fair trial as a result of the alleged violation by the prosecutor of the trial court’s Sandoval ruling. We disagree. The cross-examination of a defendant in regard to matters precluded by the trial court’s Sandoval ruling constitutes error (see, People v Wilkens, 177…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. AshwalNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- People v. DurhamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- People v. PerezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- People v. BouteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- People v. WilkensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. RogersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. HowardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- People v. RogersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013