Price v. Barry
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed PER CURIAM.
2Per curiam 1
The main question presented by this appeal is whether the District of Columbia Code creates a liberty interest in parole that is protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.1 We hold that it does not.2
James Edward Price, an inmate at Lorton Correctional Complex, brought this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, claiming that the District of Columbia Board of Parole had violated his ■civil rights. Specifically, appellant alleges that the Board violated his due process rights when it failed to parole him in a “timely manner.” The district…
Also in this document: Per curiam 2.
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Kentucky Department of Corrections v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Board of Pardons v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by12 opinions
- Robert Franklin v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
- Franklin v. BarryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1995
- Price v. BarryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- Garcia v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1999
- Franklin v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.