Fortuna v. Fortuna
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtLampron, J.
Our statute (RSA 458:17, 27) confers upon the Trial Court the determination of the right to and the amount of support to be awarded. It provides no minimum or maximum standards. Ballou v. Ballou, 95 N. H. 105, 106. “The Court has a wide discretion in determining the amount that a father shall be required to contribute for the support of his family.” Guggenheimer v. Guggenheimer, 99 N. H. 399, 403. These considerations apply to the original award as well as to any modification thereof which can be made at any time. Benjamin v. Benjamin, 99 N. H. 117, 119. However, to obtain a modification of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Crosby v. CrosbySupreme Court of Virginia · 1944
- Warren v. WarrenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
- Curry v. CurrySupreme Court of Colorado · 1938
- Hensinger v. HensingerMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
- Perkins v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943
3Cited by28 opinions
- Noddin v. NoddinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- Gordon v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1978
- Perreault v. CookSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
- Giles v. GilesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
- Calderwood v. CalderwoodSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.