Matter of Downer
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1DissentO’Hern, J.
I joined the dissenting opinion in In re Bell, 126 N.J. 261, 596 A.2d 752 (1991) that suggested:
[Although the Wilson rule [of almost invariable disbarment] is the right rule for the vast majority of misappropriation cases, the inflexibility with which it can be applied runs the risk of creating within our attorney-discipline system an almost reflexive approach to such cases, obscuring and ignoring the individual circumstances to an intolerable degree.
[Id. at 267, 596 A.2d 752 (Stein, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part) (quoting In re Konopka, 126 N.J. 225, 241, 596 A.2d 733 (1991)…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re WilsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- Matter of HollendonnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- Matter of KonopkaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
- Matter of FarrSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
- Matter of BellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.