Legal Opinion · Dissent

Matter of Downer

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided April 19, 1996Published

1DissentO’Hern, J.

I joined the dissenting opinion in In re Bell, 126 N.J. 261, 596 A.2d 752 (1991) that suggested:

[Although the Wilson rule [of almost invariable disbarment] is the right rule for the vast majority of misappropriation cases, the inflexibility with which it can be applied runs the risk of creating within our attorney-discipline system an almost reflexive approach to such cases, obscuring and ignoring the individual circumstances to an intolerable degree.

[Id. at 267, 596 A.2d 752 (Stein, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part) (quoting In re Konopka, 126 N.J. 225, 241, 596 A.2d 733 (1991)…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re WilsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  2. Matter of HollendonnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  3. Matter of KonopkaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
  4. Matter of FarrSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  5. Matter of BellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API