Legal Opinion

State v. Arnold

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 12, 1995No. C90-11-36757; CA A70340PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

The Supreme Court has remanded this case for consideration of defendant’s remaining assignments of error after it held that we erred in reversing defendant’s convictions when defendant discovered, after trial, the extent to which a state’s witness, Lynn Jenkins, had lied in her testimony. Defendant was convicted of four counts of sexual abuse in the first degree. The victim was defendant’s four-year-old daughter. The facts are set forth in our opinion at 118 Or App 64, 846 P2d 418 (1993), and in the Supreme Court’s opinion at 320 Or 111, 879 P2d 1272 (1994). We need not repeat them here.

Defend…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. MiddletonOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. MoenOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. IsomOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. BarkleyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. VosikaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Davis v. County of ClackamasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  2. Harris v. MorrowCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  3. State v. SwettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API