Legal Opinion

State v. . Burnette

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 2, 1938PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.

One of the defendant’s exceptions is directed to the failure of the court below to charge the jury as to its right to return a verdict of guilty of a less degree of the crime charged in the bill of indictment. In this connection the court charged the jury: “If you are satisfied from the evidence and beyond a reasonable doubt as to the guilt of the defendant, your verdict will be ‘guilty.’ If you have a reasonable doubt as to his guilt, from all the evidence, you will return a verdict of ‘not guilty.’ ”... And again, “If you are satisfied, and beyond a reasonable doubt, of his guilt, whether…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. . RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  2. State v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  3. State v. . LutterlohSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. RieraSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. State v. YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  3. State v. ArdreySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  4. State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  5. State v. Troy McNeill.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API