Legal Opinion

Trotter v. Board of President & Directors of St. Louis Public Schools

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided January 15, 1845PublishedCited by 6 opinions

ERROR to St. Louis Court of Common Pleas. POINTS AND AUTHORITIES. 1. The right of the plaintiff below is limited and governed entirely by the words of the second section of the act of Congress, of 13th June, 1812, and is confined to “all towns or village lots, out-lots, or common field lots,” included within an out-houndary line directed by that act, and not rightfully owned or claimed by any private individuals. 2 Story’s Laws 1257, act of June, 1812 ; 3 Story’s Laws 1972,…

Read the full summary

ERROR to St. Louis Court of Common Pleas. POINTS AND AUTHORITIES. 1. The right of the plaintiff below is limited and governed entirely by the words of the second section of the act of Congress, of 13th June, 1812, and is confined to “all towns or village lots, out-lots, or common field lots,” included within an out-houndary line directed by that act, and not rightfully owned or claimed by any private individuals. 2 Story’s Laws 1257, act of June, 1812 ; 3 Story’s Laws 1972, act of May 26, 1824; 4 Story’s Laws 220, act of January 27, 1831 ; act of General Assembly of Missouri, February 13,…

1Opinion of the CourtNapton, J.

This was an action of ejectment to recover a lot in the city of St. Louis, bounded east by Second street, south by Cherry street, west by Third street, and north by a lot or small tract of five or six acres, granted to J. Glamorgan, and surveyed in 1803.

The plaintiffs below recovered a judgment for a portion of said lot.

The title of the plaintiffs was derived from the act of Congress of *74June 13, 1812, making further provision for settling the claims to land in the territory of Missouri.

It appeared that in accordance with the act of the Territorial Legislature of 18th June, 1808, authorizing…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Law County Board v. SpartanburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
  2. State ex rel. Lloyd v. ClaytonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Vasquez v. EwingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1868
  4. Lewis v. . HynesSuperior Court of North Carolina · 1796
  5. Bouker v. RandlesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1865

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API