Legal Opinion

Arnold v. Bright

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1879PublishedCited by 41 opinions

Appeal from Kalamazoo. Bill to cancel a lease. Defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMarston, J.

The bill in this case was filed to set aside a written lease for a term of years, procured through the alleged fraudulent representations of the lessee David B. Bright. The lease was of a farm, upon which was a small vineyard, and raspberry and strawberry plantations.

The fraud charged was that defendant David B. importuned complainant for a lease of the farm, and “made great pretensions to exceptional knowledge and skill and experience as a practical and scientific farmer in all branches of husbandry.” The evidence relied upon to show the fraudulent character of such representation consisted…

2Cited by41 opinions

  1. James v. E. Weinstein & SonsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  2. Bachman v. . HarringtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  3. Powhatan Coal & Coke Co. v. RitzWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Southwestern Associated Tel. Co. v. City of DalhartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  5. Tawas & Bay County Railroad v. Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1880

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API