Arnold v. Bright
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Kalamazoo. Bill to cancel a lease. Defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtMarston, J.
The bill in this case was filed to set aside a written lease for a term of years, procured through the alleged fraudulent representations of the lessee David B. Bright. The lease was of a farm, upon which was a small vineyard, and raspberry and strawberry plantations.
The fraud charged was that defendant David B. importuned complainant for a lease of the farm, and “made great pretensions to exceptional knowledge and skill and experience as a practical and scientific farmer in all branches of husbandry.” The evidence relied upon to show the fraudulent character of such representation consisted…
2Cited by41 opinions
- James v. E. Weinstein & SonsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
- Bachman v. . HarringtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Powhatan Coal & Coke Co. v. RitzWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1906
- Southwestern Associated Tel. Co. v. City of DalhartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
- Tawas & Bay County Railroad v. Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.