Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Anderson v. Maronda Homes, Inc. of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 27, 2012No. 2D11-4203Published

1Concurrence

LaROSE, Judge,

Specially concurring.

This appeal centers on an arbitrator’s clause construction award holding that Vivian Anderson could not pursue class action arbitration against Maronda Homes, Inc. of Florida. In my view, the arbitrator did not manifestly disregard the law nor did he exceed his authority. Accordingly, the trial court properly confirmed the arbitrator’s award and denied Ms. Anderson’s motion to vacate the award. I agree that *128the trial court’s order should be affirmed. Some words are necessary, however, to address what are important and not conclusively resolved issues…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hall Street Associates, L. L. C. v. Mattel, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Stolt-Nielsen S. A. v. AnimalFeeds International Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. Mastrobuono v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Preston v. FerrerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  5. Discover Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API