Application of Krueger
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
O’CONNELL, Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming that of the Primary Examiner in rejecting, for lack of invention over the cited references, the single claim of appellant’s application for a patent on a new, original, and ornamental design of an air diffuser, shown in two figures of the drawings which form the basis of appellant’s application.
The references relied upon are:
Guth D- 77,765 Feb. 19, 1929
Kurth et al. D-120,266 Apr. 30, 1940
Baker D-155,680 Oct. 25, 1949
The design defined by the claim on appeal was accurately…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Smith v. Whitman Saddle Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Forestek Plating & Mfg. Co. v. Knapp-Monarch Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939
- Application of JenningsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
- Application of BigelowCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
- Application of BigelowCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re RosenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
- In re LeslieCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
- In re AslanianCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
- RM Palmer Company v. Luden's, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1955