Legal Opinion

Application of Bigelow

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 14, 1952No. Patent Appeal 5842PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARRETT, Chief Judge.

Reversal is here sought of the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the rejection by the Primary Examiner of appellant’s application for a patent for an aircraft tire tread design.

The claim, following the conventional form of design claims, reads: “The ornamental Design for an Aircraft Tire; substantially as shown and described.”

This is one of three companion cases, the three being concurrently decided. See In re Bigelow, 194 F.2d 549, 39 C.C.P.A., Patents, --- and In re Bigelow, 194 F.2d 550, 39 C.C.P.A., Patents, ---.

Appellant…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gorham Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Application of JenningsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
  3. Application of JabourCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
  4. Application of BigelowCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
  5. In Re EppingerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Laskowitz v. Marie Designer, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1954
  2. In re AslanianCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
  3. Application of KruegerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
  4. Application of WeilCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
  5. Application of Ferguson (Five Cases)Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API