Legal Opinion

Mullen v. Town of Newcastle

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 1913No. 22,495PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Prom Blackford Circuit Court; Charles E. Sturgis, Judge. Action by Joel Mullen against the Town of Newcastle. Prom a judgment for defendant, the plaintiff appeals. (Transferred from the Appellate Court under §1405 Burns 1908, Acts 1901 p. 590.)

1Opinion of the CourtMorris, J.

Appellant sued appellee for damages for loss of services, etc., of his wife, resulting from injuries sustained by her falling into a hole in a sidewalk, which, it was averred, was negligently left open by appellee. Appellee filed its answer to the complaint, in which it was alleged that the cause of action sued on, did not accrue within two years: next before the bringing of the action. To this answer appellant demurred, for want of facts. The demurrer was overruled, and plaintiff electing to stand on his exceptions to the ruling, judgment was rendered for defendant. This ruling presents the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Burroughs v. BurroughsIndiana Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Burroughs v. BurroughsIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Graf v. City Transit Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Markel v. GlassmeyerNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Desjourdy v. MesrobianSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1932
  5. Cliff v. Seligman & LatzCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API