Legal Opinion · Dissent

Skelly Oil Co. v. Harrell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 16, 1943No. 30408Published

1Dissent

GIBSON, V. C. J.

(dissenting). The plain meaning of the statute of limitation involved herein is changed by the so-called liberal construction in the majority opinion. To reach its conclusion, that opinion inserts words into the statute that were not employed by the Legislature. If the statute is to be changed, it is the function of the Legislature to do so.

It is provided in 85 O. S. 1941 § 43:

“The jurisdiction of the commission to reopen any cause upon an applica- • tion based upon a change in condition shall extend for the maximum period of time measured by the number of weeks for which…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Scruggs Bros. & Bill Garage v. State Industrial Com.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. White Oak Refining Co. v. WhiteheadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  3. Board of Com'rs of Rogers County v. BaxterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  5. Earl W. Baker & Co. v. MorrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API