Legal Opinion

Coleman v. Forister

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1968No. B-524PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING, APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF ERROR

Petitioners request that we note the rationale of our refusal of writ of error (n.r.e.) since the court of civil appeals had three alternative bases for its decision. 418 S.W.2d 550. A majority of the court approves the holding of the court of civil appeals that in view of surrounding circumstances, the following language, as a matter of law, gives the grantees an unrestricted right to use the full 160 by 420 foot lot in controversy for ingress and egress to Bee Creek:

“ ‘This grant is specifically understood to cover only a one-foot strip…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Forister v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Coleman v. ForisterTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Wallace v. McKinzie, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1993
  3. GXG, INC. v. Texacal Oil & Gas, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1998
  4. Turberville v. Upper Valley Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  5. Coleman v. ForisterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API