Legal Opinion

Wallace v. McKinzie

Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)

Decided December 29, 1993No. 07-93-0046-CVPublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DODSON, Justice.

Appellants, Leola King Wallace and her children, Susan Lee Wallace, Bilby Joe Wallace, and Bert Carol Wallace (the Wallaces), appeal from a judgment granting a permanent equitable easement of ingress and egress across their property in favor of ap-pellees, A.D. McKinzie and his wife, Velma McKinzie (the McKinzies). We affirm.

In four points of error, the Wallaces assert that the trial court erred in awarding the McKinzies an equitable easement over the road leading to Section 44 because (1 & 2) the evidence is legally or factually insufficient to support the jury’s finding that…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Glover v. Texas General Indemnity Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Roark v. AllenTexas Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Bickler v. BicklerTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Greer v. GreerTexas Supreme Court · 1946

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. West Beach Marina, Ltd. v. Erdeljac, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2002
  2. Holden v. Weidenfeller, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1996
  3. MacK v. Landry, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
  4. Stallman v. Newman, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
  5. Allen v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2008

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API