Legal Opinion

Rommell v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 4, 1981No. 79-508PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

394 So.2d 572 (1981)

Charles ROMMELL, Appellant,

v.

FIRESTONE TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 79-508.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

March 4, 1981.

Jack B. Nichols and Harold L. Downing, Nichols & Associates, P.A., Orlando, for appellant.

David L. Holbrook, Wells, Gattis & Hallowes, P.A., Orlando, for appellee.

FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr., Judge.

Appellant had filed suit against Firestone to recover for damages he sustained when his truck overturned on the highway. Appellant had claimed that the accident was due to the "blow-out" of two Firestone tires on his truck. He appeals…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McArthur v. CookSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  2. Mead v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  3. Hendrick v. StrazzullaSupreme Court of Florida · 1961
  4. Irvin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  5. Robinson v. Citrus Council of Girl Scouts, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cummings v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  2. Reeser v. Boats Unlimited, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  3. Gavins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  4. Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. Co. v. KaminesterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  5. Parks v. ZitnikDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API