Legal Opinion

Mead v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided April 11, 1956PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

86 So.2d 773 (1956)

Ralph MEAD, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Florida. Special Division B.

April 11, 1956.

Martin & Martin, Plant City, for appellant.

Richard W. Ervin, Atty. Gen., and David U. Tumin, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

THOMAS, Justice.

The appellant was convicted of grand larceny, was adjudged guilty of that crime, and was sentenced to serve five years in the State penitentiary. He maintains here that error committed in his trial was so prejudicial that he should be tried anew. We will discuss and decide in the order in which they are argued in his brief the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Croft v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
  2. Martin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1924
  3. Damico v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1943
  4. Washington v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1923
  5. Madison v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Fulton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
  2. McArthur v. CookSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  3. Lawhorne v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  4. Cummings v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  5. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company v. GaneyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API