Legal Opinion
State v. Momah
Washington Supreme Court
Decided October 8, 2009No. 81096-6PublishedCited by 158 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
217 P.3d 321 (2009)
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Charles MOMAH, Petitioner.
No. 81096-6.
Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
Argued June 10, 2008.
Decided October 8, 2009.
James Morrissey Whisman, King County Prosecutor's Office, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.
Sheryl Gordon McCloud, Law Offices of Sheryl Gordon McCloud, Jeffrey L. Fisher, Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, Seattle, WA, for Petitioner.
C. JOHNSON, J.
¶ 1 The Washington Constitution provides in relevant part that an accused has the right to "a speedy public trial by an impartial jury." Const. art. I, § 22 (emphasis added). This case asks…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Waller v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Riverside Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Washington v. RecuencoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- State v. Bone-ClubWashington Supreme Court · 1995
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by158 opinions
- State v. SublettWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. WiseWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. StrodeWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. PaumierWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. LormorWashington Supreme Court · 2011
153 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.