Legal Opinion

Parker v. Superior Court

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 1901No. 3964PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Original Application for Prohibition.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mount, J.

This is an application for a writ of prohibition commanding the superior court of Snohomish county and the judg’e thereof to desist and refrain from further proceeding in a certain cause instituted by Carstens & Earles, Incorporated, and others, in said court, against these plaintiffs to condemn a stream known as “Bear Creek,” and a strip of land 25 feet wide on each side of the center line of that stream, over and through certain lands of the plaintiffs herein, as and for a right of way for logging purposes. The affidavit upon which the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. New Orleans, Mobile & Texas R. R. v. Southern & Atlantic Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1875
  2. State ex rel. Cape Girardeau v. EngelmannSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  3. Spahr v. SchofieldIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Lake Pleasanton Water Co. v. Contra Costa Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Seattle Electric Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Holly Shelter Railroad v. NewtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  3. Carstens & Earles v. ParkerWashington Supreme Court · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API