Legal Opinion

Lake Pleasanton Water Co. v. Contra Costa Water Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1885No. 8816PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the county of Alameda. The-facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

A demurrer to the amended complaint of the plaintiff having been sustained by the court below, and the *660plaintiff having declined further to amend, judgment was entered for the defendant, from which the appeal is taken. The action is to condemn certain land of the defendant to be used by the plaintiff for the purpose of a reservoir in which to store water.

It is alleged in the complaint that the plaintiff is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State, for the purpose of supplying the inhabitants of the cities of San Francisco and Oakland with pure fresh water, and for the…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Spring Valley Water Works v. DrinkhouseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. People v. Buellton Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1943
  3. City of Santa Rosa v. Fountain Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Parker v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API