State v. Cantu
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 124,303 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. JOHN R. CANTU, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. The right to testify on one's own behalf at a criminal trial is a fundamental right grounded in multiple provisions of the United States Constitution. 2. While a finding of forfeiture is the most overt way in which a defendant may be deprived of the right to testify, a court may also infringe on the right to testify by striking the defendant's testimony. 3. Most constitutional errors can be reviewed for harmlessness. A constitutional error is harmless only…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. AllenSupreme Court of Kansas · 2026
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 2025
- State v. RigginsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2025