Axtell v. Workman
Indiana Court of Appeals
From the Greene Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.
Counsel for appellants have argued two alleged errors specified in the assignment, — that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and that the court erred in overruling the motion of the appellants to set aside the summons and the service thereof.
The action was upon a promissory note assigned by indorsement in writing by the payee to the appellee. The complaint consists of two paragraphs, without any apparent reason for more thari one.
A copy of the note with a copy of the assignment was inserted between these paragraphs and was referred to in each as…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Briggs v. SneghanIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Eastes v. EastesIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Ross v. GlassIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
3Cited by3 opinions
- Town of Knox v. GoldingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1910
- Chicago & Southeastern Railway Co. v. HarrisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
- State ex rel. Indiana District of the United Pentecostal Church, Inc. v. Madison County Superior Court, No. 2Indiana Supreme Court · 1968