Legal Opinion

Chicago & Southeastern Railway Co. v. Harris

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 27, 1897No. 2,199PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From the Clinton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.

— This cause was commenced in the Montgomery Circuit Court. A bill of exceptions showed that on the 5th of June, 1894, the appellant entered a special appearance in that court and stated its objection in writing to the jurisdiction of the court over the appellant, and for cause assigned that no summons or notice of any kind had been issued by the court or served upon the appellant prior to the 24th day of the then present term of the court, all of which, it was stated in the written objection, appeared on the records of the court.

The court overruled the objection, and took jurisdiction of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hopper v. LucasIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Chicago & Atlantic Railway Co. v. SummersIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Eastes v. EastesIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Chicago & Southeastern Railway Co. v. AdamsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
  5. Axtell v. WorkmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Town of Knox v. GoldingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1910
  2. Chicago & Southeastern Railway Co. v. AdamsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901
  3. Chicago & Southeastern Railway Co. v. BrowersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API