Legal Opinion

Utter v. Eaton Corporation

North Carolina Industrial Commission

Decided March 16, 1995No. I.C. No. 030842Published

1Opinion of the Court

Prior to the hearing, the parties did not submit an Agreement for Compensation (I. C. Form 21); however, defendant did not contest that plaintiff had sustained an admittedly compensable injury by accident and defendant paid temporary-total disability compensation to plaintiff for approximately three years.

In December 1992, defendant filed an Application to Stop Payment (I. C. Form 24) which was denied by the Claims Department of the Industrial Commission on 6 January 1993. No explanation was given for the denial, but it is the policy of the Claims Department to deny all Applications to Stop…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Russell v. Lowes Product DistributionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  2. Hyler v. GTE Products Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  3. Hill v. Hanes Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API