Legal Opinion

Hill v. Hanes Corp.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 5, 1991No. 8910IC1118PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COZORT, Judge.

Plaintiff appeals from the Industrial Commission’s 24 July 1989 award modifying an award entered 23 October 1984. We affirm.

“Appellate review of opinions and awards of the Industrial Commission is strictly limited to the discovery and correction of legal errors.” Godley v. County of Pitt, 306 N.C. 357, 359, 293 S.E.2d 167, 169 (1982) (emphasis in original). With this standard *47of review in mind, we turn to the pertinent procedural history of the case below.

In the Opinion and Award filed 2 December 1983, Deputy Commissioner William L. Haigh of the North Carolina Industrial…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Godley v. County of PittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Rewis v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  3. McLean v. Roadway Express, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Hill v. Hanes Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  5. West v. JP Stevens CompanyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Graves v. Eaton CorporationNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 1999
  2. Lewis v. the Kroger CompanyNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 1996
  3. Utter v. Eaton CorporationNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 1995
  4. Wisnieski v. Vine Veterinary HospitalNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API