Davis v. Hinckley
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a decree of distribution in the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. J. V. Coffey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
This is an appeal by Sarah Davis from a decree of distribution to Florence Blythe Hinckley of the property and estate of Thomas H. Blythe, deceased.
The said Blythe died intestate in April, 1883. Letters of administration upon his estate were issued in that year to Philip A. Roach, who was afterward succeeded by others as administrators. More than one year after the issuance of letters the respondent herein, Florence Blythe Hinckley, then Florence Blythe, commenced proceedings, under section 1664 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to have the claims of all persons to said estate, and its…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Elwood v. . the Western Union Telegraph Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Blythe v. AyresCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Blankman v. VallejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Blythe v. AyresCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Baker v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- The Title & Document Restoration Co. v. KerriganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Estate of RadovichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Estate of WiseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Stevens v. TorreganoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Weidenhoft v. PrimmWyoming Supreme Court · 1908
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.