Legal Opinion

Quint v. Martin

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided January 19, 2023No. 3:21-cv-01695Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT RICHARD R. QUINT, ) CASE NO. 3:21-cv-1695 (KAD) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) MARTIN, et al., ) JANUARY 19, 2023 Defendants. ) INITIAL REVIEW ORDER RE: THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT Kari A. Dooley, United States District Judge: Previously, pro se Plaintiff, Richard R. Quint (“Quint”), filed a Second Amended Complaint under

42 U.S.C. § 1983

against ten defendants.1 On February 24, 2022, the Court2 dismissed the Second Amended Complaint. See Doc. No. 17. The Court permitted Quint to file a Third Amended Complaint by March 28, 2022 to correct the deficiencies…

2Cases cited26 opinions

Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
Pell v. ProcunierSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.