Legal Opinion
Profectus Technology LLC v. Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided May 26, 2016No. 2015-1016, 2015-1018, 2015-1019PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge Reyna.
Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge Moore.
Reyna, Circuit Judge.
Profectus Technology LLC (“Profectus”) appeals a district court’s claim construction order and grant of summary judgment of non-infringement. The patent-in-suit is directed to a mountable digital picture frame for displaying digital images. Pro-fectus asserted certain of the patent claims against manufacturers and sellers of tablet computer devices. After construing the term “mountable,” the district court granted summary judgment of non-infringement on grounds that the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Renishaw Plc v. Marposs Societa' Per Azioni and Marposs CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Thorner v. Sony Computer Entertainment America LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Teva Pharm. United States, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2015
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Tex. Advanced Optoelectronic Solutions, Inc. v. Renesas Elecs. Am., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Centrak, Inc. v. Sonitor Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Seabed Geosolutions (Us) Inc. v. Magseis Ff LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
- Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Actavis LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Parkervision, Inc. v. Qualcomm IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2024
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.