Legal Opinion

Globe Leather & Shoe Findings, Inc. v. Golburgh

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 10, 1959PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCounihan, J.

This is an action of tort brought to recover for damage sustained by the plaintiff to personal property in the basement of a store numbered 1112 Washington Street, Boston, which it was alleged was rented to the plaintiff by the defendant. The first count is for negligence of the defendant in maintaining a drainpipe in adjoining premises of the defendant. The second count is for a nuisance upon the same facts. The findings of the auditor and the evidence before the jury indicate that both counts are for the same cause of action.

The action was referred to an auditor, whose findings of facts…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Andrews v. WilliamsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
  2. Ross v. BroitmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  3. Commonwealth v. MercadoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  4. Chalfen v. KraftMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  5. Gilroy v. BadgerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ducey v. Springfield Co-Operative BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960
  2. Regan v. NelsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963
  3. Raylite Electric Corp. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API