Raylite Electric Corp. v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1DissentEager, J.
I would modify to reverse and vacate the judgment dismissing plaintiff’s complaint as against the defendant New York City Housing Authority and remand for a new trial as to said defendant. In my opinion, the Housing Authority, as the owner and person in control of the Crookston Building, was under a duty to plaintiff, as its tenant in the adjoining building, to exercise reasonable care in the management and use of the Crookston Building. The duty of said defendant, as landlord, is to be determined in light of all the circumstances and on the basis of what was reasonably foreseeable as a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Paltey v. . EganNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Payne v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Brown v. City of SiouxSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951
- Smith v. FaxonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
- Peck v. WeilAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.