Public Utility District No. 1 v. Inland Power & Light Co.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.
This is a review by certiorari of a decree of public use and necessity.
The decree provides that: (1) the contemplated acquisition by Public Utility District No. 1 of Pend Oreille County, Washington (herein called the District) of all the electrical works, lines, plants, facilities, and electrical properties now owned and operated in Pend Oreille County by the Inland Power & Light Company (herein called Inland) that are *123useful for generation, transmission, and distribution of electricity is a public necessity; and (2) the contemplated use of the property sought to be taken is a public use. The…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Minnesota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Finn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- United States v. BrosnanSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Stanley v. SchwalbySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Public Utility District No. 1 of Pend Oreille County v. United States of America, Inland Power & Light Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- City of Fairbanks v. Electric Distribution System in Island Homes Subdivision of FairbanksAlaska Supreme Court · 1966
- City of Pullman v. GloverWashington Supreme Court · 1968
- City of Mesa v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- Love v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.