Legal Opinion

City of Mesa v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1966No. 8200PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McFarland, Justice.

The City of Mesa, a municipal corporation, the appellant — hereinafter designated the plaintiff' — brought an action in eminent domain to condemn a portion of the electrical plant and system of the Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District, an agricultural improvement district — hereinafter designated the defendant — located at the Bayless Shopping Center on East Main Street in Mesa, Arizona.

Defendant filed a motion to dismiss the action on the ground that the United States of America is an indispensable party to the action, and therefore the court…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Wickard v. FilburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. United States v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. Minnesota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. SolarCity Corp. v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  2. Love v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1994
  3. Salt River Valley Water Users' Ass'n v. GiglioArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  4. SALT RIVER VALLEY WATER USERS'ASS'N v. GiglioArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Solarcity Corp. v. Salt River Project Ai&p Dist.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API