City of Mesa v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
McFarland, Justice.
The City of Mesa, a municipal corporation, the appellant — hereinafter designated the plaintiff' — brought an action in eminent domain to condemn a portion of the electrical plant and system of the Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District, an agricultural improvement district — hereinafter designated the defendant — located at the Bayless Shopping Center on East Main Street in Mesa, Arizona.
Defendant filed a motion to dismiss the action on the ground that the United States of America is an indispensable party to the action, and therefore the court…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Wickard v. FilburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Minnesota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- SolarCity Corp. v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Love v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1994
- Salt River Valley Water Users' Ass'n v. GiglioArizona Supreme Court · 1976
- SALT RIVER VALLEY WATER USERS'ASS'N v. GiglioArizona Supreme Court · 1976
- Solarcity Corp. v. Salt River Project Ai&p Dist.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017