Legal Opinion

O'Neill Construction Co. v. Philadelphia

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 20, 1939No. Appeal, 317PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Stern,

In the construction of the Little Tacony Creek sewer, from a point southwest of Lewis Street to the junction of Little Tacony and Frankford Creeks, the City of Philadelphia let the job in two sections, one extending from the northeasterly end to a point about 700 feet northeast of Frankford Creek, and the other completing the sewer southwesterly to that creek. The first section was constructed by the firm of Mazóla & Morana and was finished about a year before the second was begun. Plaintiff company was the low bidder on the latter job. It entered into a contract…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hollerbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Christie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. United States v. Atlantic Dredging Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Jackson v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  5. Jackson v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  2. Codell Construction Co. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1977
  3. M. L. Shalloo, Inc. v. Ricciardi & Sons Construction, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  4. Commonwealth v. Acchioni & Canuso, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. State v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1949

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API