Legal Opinion

Lutz v. State Workmen's Insurance Fund

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 27, 1936No. Appeal, 377PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cubiam,

This case is ruled by our decision in Bock v. D. B. Frampton & Co., 105 Pa. Superior Ct. 380, 161 A. 762. We said in that case, speaking through Judge Gawthbop: “Prior to the passage of the amendment [of April 29, 1929, P. L. 853] the [Workmen’s Compensation] Act did not apply to any accident occurring outside of the Commonwealth. The amendment of 1929 made an exception to ‘accidents occurring to Pennsylvania employees whose duties require them to go temporarily beyond the territorial limits of the Commonwealth, not over ninety days, when such employees are performing services for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bock v. D. B. Frampton & Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Duskin v. Pennsylvania-Central Airlines CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1948
  2. Nemitz v. Air Services InternationalCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Salkind v. Pennsylvania Threshermen & Farmers' Mutual Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Salkind v. Pa. T. F. Mut. Cas. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Knox v. Georgia-Pacific Plywood CompanySupreme Court of Delaware · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API