Legal Opinion

Finn v. Young

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1907No. 6525PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Albertson, J., entered May 18, 1906, granting a nonsuit at the close of plaintiff’s case, in an action between partners for fraudulent representations inducing a sale of partnership property.

1Opinion of the CourtMount, J.

At the close of plaintiff’s evidence, the trial court granted a nonsuit in this'case upon motion of the defendant, and dismissed the action. The plaintiff appeals.

The errors assigned are based upon the ruling on the motion for nonsuit. The evidence on the part of the plain*75tiff shows that, for two or three years prior to 1901, plaintiff and defendant were equal partners, owning a sawmill and other property at Shakan, in the territory of Alaska. The plaintiff resided at Shakan and conducted the business. The defendant spent most of his time in Juneau, Alaska, and Seattle, Washington. In the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jennings v. RickardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
  2. Caldwell v. DavisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
  3. Wright v. DukeNew York Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Karle v. SederWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Galbraith v. DevlinWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Jacobsen v. ArntzenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1969
  4. Kittilsby v. VevelstadWashington Supreme Court · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API