Larson v. Sterling Mut. Life Ins. Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
CODY, Justice.
Having affirmed the judgment of the trial court on the.original hearing on the grounds that appellants’ cause was barred, it was not necessary to state the facts. Our disposition of the motion for a new trial now requires that a full statement be made.
This is an action by appellants against appellee to cancel two companion contracts on two different grounds. First, that they were consummated in fraud; second, that they were ultra vires and illegal on the part of the defendant.
The following statement, taken substantially from appellants’ brief, we consider accurate, though…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- King v. WiseTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
- Causeway Investment Co. v. NassTexas Supreme Court · 1938
- Clark v. Texas Co-op. Inv. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1921
- Sterling Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. LarsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
3Cited by3 opinions
- Allen v. Great Liberty Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
- W. K. Ewing Co. v. KruegerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
- Allen v. Great Liberty Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975