Everett v. Lusk
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Barton District Court. Ejectment, brought by Everett. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion. Second trial at September Term 1876. Judgment in favor of defendant Lush, and plaintiff brings the case here.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
This was an action in the nature of ejectment, brought to recover a certain strip of land. It is admitted by the parties that the plaintiff owns the N.E. J of section 9, in township 19 south, of range 14 west, in Barton county, and that the defendant owns the N. W. J of section 10 in said township and range. The strip of land in controversy is a part of either one or the other of said quarter-sections, or belongs partly to one and partly to the other. It lies along the common boundary between them; and to which it belongs, or how much to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Benz v. HinesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1866
- McArthur v. PorterSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gatton v. TolleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
- Tarpenning v. CannonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
- Shaffer v. WeechSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
- Reinert v. BruntSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
- Erskin v. WoodSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.