Tarpenning v. Cannon
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Smith District Court. At the October Term, 1881, of the district court, plaiutiif Cannon recovered a certain judgment against defendant Tar-penning, who brings the case here. The opinion states the facts.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Horton, C. J.:
This is a contest between owners of adjacent tracts of land, desiring to have established permanently the lines and corners thereof. The trial'was commenced at *666the May term, 1881, of the district court of Smith county, the trial being to the court without a jury. The court, after hearing all of the evidence and arguments of counsel, took the case under advisement until the October term following. At said term, and on the 6th day of October, the court rendered a finding that the survey and boundary lines between sections 33 and 34, 27 and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Diehl v. ZangerMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Stewart v. CarletonMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Brenner v. BigelowSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
- McAlpine v. ReichenekerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
- Coleman v. EdwardsOhio Supreme Court · 1855
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Miller v. Mills CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
- Wideman v. FaivreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
- Coumas v. Transcontinental Garage, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1951
- Hoffman v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
- Miller v. Topeka Land Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1890
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.