Legal Opinion

McQueen v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 20, 2007No. 33A01-0607-CR-304PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VAIDIK, Judge.

Case Summary

Chad McQueen appeals the trial court’s revocation of his direct commitment to a community corrections program and order to serve the remainder of his six-year sentence in the Indiana Department of Correction (“DOC”). Because McQueen admitted that he took OxyContin and as a result tested positive for oxycodone in violation of the Henry County Work Release Center rules, McQueen cannot establish fundamental error in the trial court’s admission of testimony regarding the results of the toxicology report. Next, because McQueen had violated several of the Work…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cox v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Mathews v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Hopkins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Harris v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Kincaid v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. State v. SparksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
  2. Hayworth v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Floyd William Treece v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. John Aaron Shoultz III v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Carlos Hale v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API