Legal Opinion
Cummings v. Isenberg
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 1, 1937No. 6684PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGroner, J.
This is a suit begun by Richard M. Isenberg (appellee) under section 9 of the Trading With the Enemy Act, as amended (50 U.S.C.A. Appendix § 9), against the Alien Property Custodian and the Treasurer of the United States, to recover approximately $67,000, the balance of the proceeds of property which had been seized by the Custodian in January, 1918. There was a decree below for appellee.
Appellee had already claimed, and there had been returned to him, the portions of the property returnable under the provisions of the Winslow Act (42 Stat. 1511) and under the Settlement of War Claims Act…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dred Scott v. SandfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1857
- United States v. Wong Kim ArkSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- United States v. ManziSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Von Zedtwitz v. SutherlandDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1928
- Thorsch v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Isenberg v. BiddleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- Pflueger v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- Schaufus v. Attorney General of United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1942
- Sorenson v. SutherlandDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1939