Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Mayo

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 26, 1994No. 1921892PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Marvin Mayo was convicted in the Madison Municipal Court of driving under the influence of alcohol. Upon his appeal to the circuit court for a trial de novo, he filed a motion to suppress the results of a breath test that was administered to him. The circuit court held two hearings on the motion, with testimony presented by the officer who administered the test, the officer who inspected the machine on which Mayo was tested, an expert on behalf of Mayo, the director of the Department of Forensic Sciences (DFS), and the deputy director of DFS, who is the technical director of the blood alcohol…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Blackburn v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Patton v. City of DecaturSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  3. Ex Parte BushSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  4. Estes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978
  5. Whetstone v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1981

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Harkins v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Tims v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  3. Gwarjanski v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1996
  4. Steiner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  5. Devin Jay Hardman v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2020

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API