Steiner v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
Janis Rodgers Steiner was convicted in Baldwin District Court of driving under the influence of alcohol, a violation of §32-5A-191(a), Ala. Code 1975. She appealed to Baldwin Circuit Court, and a jury found her guilty of driving under the influence.
I
Before trial, Steiner moved to suppress the introduction of the results of an Intoxilyzer 5000 ("I-5000") test performed by Alabama State Trooper Stan Stabler on the grounds that the State would be unable to establish a proper predicate for the introduction of the test results. Steiner argued that the State would be unable to prove that the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. Paul v. OatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Maria Orozco, United States of America v. Jose Liva-CoronaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Christopher D. WilmerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- McLemore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990
- Ex Parte BushSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. DillinerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2002
- Mester v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1999
- Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1997
- Heflin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2002
- M.T.S. v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.