Russell v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
LATTIMORE, Judge.
Appellant was convicted in the District Court of Bowie County of manufacturing intoxicating liquor in viola tion of the Dean Law, Act Second Called Session, Thirty-sixth Legislature,- page 228, and his punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for one year.
When the case was called appellant asked for a continuance to obtain the testimony of several witnesses, most of whom appear to be for direct or indirect impeachment of the State’s main witness, one McCarty. This character of testimony is ordinarily not considered sufficient to justify a continuance. Branch’s…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Perkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Belcher v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Allen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1940
- Hughes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
- Jeffers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1926
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.