Legal Opinion
John Gross v. Waldo Sederstrom, Ardell Hanneman and Charles Myers
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided June 26, 1970No. 19942_1PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEANEY, Circuit Judge.
The sole issue on this appeal is whether the lower court correctly found that the appellees were entitled to summary judgment by reason of their official immunity.
The appellant, John Gross, is the owner of a tract of land in Lake County, South Dakota, and the appellees are members of the Lake County Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service Committee. The appellant’s application to participate in the 1966 Feed Grain Program was denied by the Lake County ASC Committee. 1 The denial was based, at least in part, on information received from the appellee, Waldo…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Tenney v. BrandhoveSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Barr v. MatteoSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Gregoire v. BiddleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Willingham v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Spalding v. VilasSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- John C. Gross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- Medicare&medicaid Gu 34,507 Richard D. Bushman v. Joseph E. SeilerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- Smallwood v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1973
- Kenneth Poolman and Jeffrey Poolman v. Gerald NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Kwoun v. Southeast Missouri Professional Standards Review OrganizationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.