Legal Opinion

Dansby v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 31, 2002No. CR 00-1218PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

P ER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by appellant Ray Dansby from the denial of his petition for postconviction relief under Ark. R. Crim. P. 37.5 in connection with his capital murder convictions and death sentences. Dansby raises multiple issues in his Rule 37.5 appeal, including (1) trial counsel was ineffective in pretrial preparation; (2) trial counsel was ineffective in conducting voir dire of the jury panel; (3) trial counsel was ineffective in failing to secure the presence of a witness, Calvin Paschal; (4) trial counsel was ineffective in falling to move to suppress Dansby’s statement given…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Echols v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  2. Wooten v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  3. McGehee v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  4. Porter v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Dansby v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  2. Pilcher v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  3. Baldwin v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  4. Collins v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  5. Dansby v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API