Noe v. State

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW '

ODOM, Judge.

This is an extradition proceeding. The Court of Appeals denied relief. We grant*702ed appellant’s petition for discretionary review in order to consider the grounds of error concerning the sufficiency of the Governor’s warrant and the demand and supporting papers from Mississippi.

Art. 51.13, V.A.C.C.P., governs extradition. Section 3 relates to the form of the demand for extradition received from another state. Section 7 addresses the Governor’s warrant.

In his two arguments attacking the sufficiency of the demand appellant…