Legal Opinion

Ex Parte McClintick

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided March 26, 1997No. 04-96-00308-CRPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICKHOFF, Justice.

These consolidated appeals arise from the denial of habeas corpus where the appellant, Clyde Perry McClintick, sought relief from two separate governor’s warrants directing his extradition to the state of Arizona. In four points of error, McClintick complains the trial court erred in denying relief because the governor’s warrant and supporting paperwork are insufficient. He also complains that successive governor’s warrants violate due process and fundamental fairness. We dismiss as moot appeal number 04-96-00308-CR and affirm appeal number 04-96-00552-CR.

Background

McClintick…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Michigan v. DoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Heath v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  3. Ex Parte StaceyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  4. Stokes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  5. Ex Parte Knight, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1995

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Teixeira v. Hall, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003
  2. Ex Parte Lopez, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1999
  3. Brooks v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2002
  4. Laverty v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1998
  5. Elzie Bell v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2010

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API