Legal Opinion

King And Mockovak Eye Center, Inc. P.s., Et Ano, Resps v. Michael E. Mockovak, M.d., App

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 13, 2020No. 79290-3Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON KING AND MOCKOVAK EYE No. 79290-3-I CENTER, INC., P.S., a Washington professional service corporation; and DIVISION ONE CLEARLY LASIK, INC., a Nevada corporation, UNPUBLISHED OPINION Respondents, v. MICHAEL MOCKOVAK, M.D., an individual, Appellant. LEACH, J. — Michael Mockovak appeals the trial court’s valuation of his shares of cancelled stock in King & Mockovak Eye Center (KMEC). For the first time on appeal, he claims the trial court should not have considered off-book surgical fees as debt in this valuation. But, even had Mockovak…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State v. GuloyWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Smith v. ShannonWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Roberson v. PerezWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Roberson v. PerezWashington Supreme Court · 2005

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API