Durkee v. Busk
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DIMOND, Associate Justice.
The question presented is whether the trial court was justified in reforming a written agreement for the sale of an interest in a partnership.
In May 1947, A. J. Stockman, S. A. Busk, and Lauretta Busk [now Lauretta Durkee] executed certain “Articles of Co-Partnership” for the purpose of operating a general mercantile business and trading post at Ruby, Alaska, known as the A. J. Stock-man Store. At this time Stockman was purchasing this, business from Carl Bohn under a sales contract upon which there was remaining unpaid in excess of $32,000.
The partnership agreement…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1948
- Demetriades v. KledarasCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1956
- Elysian Homes, Inc. v. DavisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
3Cited by13 opinions
- Holiday Inns of America, Inc. v. PeckAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Kupka v. MoreyAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
- Gamble v. Northstore PartnershipAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
- Riley v. NORTHERN COM'L CO., MACHINERY DIV.Alaska Supreme Court · 1982
- Gablick v. WolfeAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.