Legal Opinion

Durkee v. Busk

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 12, 1960No. 18PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIMOND, Associate Justice.

The question presented is whether the trial court was justified in reforming a written agreement for the sale of an interest in a partnership.

In May 1947, A. J. Stockman, S. A. Busk, and Lauretta Busk [now Lauretta Durkee] executed certain “Articles of Co-Partnership” for the purpose of operating a general mercantile business and trading post at Ruby, Alaska, known as the A. J. Stock-man Store. At this time Stockman was purchasing this, business from Carl Bohn under a sales contract upon which there was remaining unpaid in excess of $32,000.

The partnership agreement…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Maryland Casualty Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1948
  2. Demetriades v. KledarasCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1956
  3. Elysian Homes, Inc. v. DavisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Holiday Inns of America, Inc. v. PeckAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Kupka v. MoreyAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Gamble v. Northstore PartnershipAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Riley v. NORTHERN COM'L CO., MACHINERY DIV.Alaska Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Gablick v. WolfeAlaska Supreme Court · 1970

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API