Legal Opinion

Copelan Et Ux. v. Stanley Co. of Amer.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 14, 1940No. Appeals, 21 and 22PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hirt, J.,

Opinion by

On January 31, 1938 the wife-plaintiff, as a patron, attended a motion picture theater operated by the defendant on Market Street in Philadelphia. At the edge of the sidewalk along the entrance to the theater there was a step 6 inches high to the level of the lobby floor. The lobby was paved with tile; the step at the pavement’s edge was 18 inches wide and was constructed of terrazzo, a synthetic material of marble chips and cement ground to a smooth surface. Plaintiff, in coming out of the theater about 7:30 p.m., as she neared the pavement edge of the lobby, slipped on…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chapman v. ClothierSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Bennett v. Jordan Marsh Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  3. Haugh v. Harris Bros. Amusement Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. Dire v. Balaban & Katz, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1926
  5. McIntyre v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Burton v. Horn & Hardart Baking Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  2. Stais v. Sears-Roebuck and Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  3. Hess v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1987
  4. Radies v. Reading Liederkranz German Singing & Sport SocietySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  5. Rogers v. BinkhamSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API