Copelan Et Ux. v. Stanley Co. of Amer.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Hirt, J.,
Opinion by
On January 31, 1938 the wife-plaintiff, as a patron, attended a motion picture theater operated by the defendant on Market Street in Philadelphia. At the edge of the sidewalk along the entrance to the theater there was a step 6 inches high to the level of the lobby floor. The lobby was paved with tile; the step at the pavement’s edge was 18 inches wide and was constructed of terrazzo, a synthetic material of marble chips and cement ground to a smooth surface. Plaintiff, in coming out of the theater about 7:30 p.m., as she neared the pavement edge of the lobby, slipped on…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chapman v. ClothierSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Bennett v. Jordan Marsh Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Haugh v. Harris Bros. Amusement Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Dire v. Balaban & Katz, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1926
- McIntyre v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Burton v. Horn & Hardart Baking Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Stais v. Sears-Roebuck and Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Hess v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1987
- Radies v. Reading Liederkranz German Singing & Sport SocietySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Rogers v. BinkhamSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.